A atom functioning as a hole sphere can not produce a force that will allow it to move. But a atom that is composed of, and acting as two independent half sphere can.

    The math of the two atom model of gravity is no problem. It's simple. The physical proof is. Till you find out how it's done. Then the physical proof becomes, no problem.

    A really weird thing happens when you find the physical proof to gravity. Mother Nature her self. The Grand Master on all the laws of nature. There are no unknown laws of nature that Mother Nature doesn't know about. Mother Nature tells you how to work the math in just such a way. That you can unite all the other forces of nature with gravity. IF you are being told the answer. Just how hard can this be. What I'm trying to say is you don't have to be Einstein to figure this one out.

    The way that thing are in science now day. There is no way to solve the two atom model of gravity. We don't have the physical proof. As of yet. You will have to go out and build or find the physical proof. We have the mat already. We just don't know how to use our mat in just the right way to make gravity work. Here's what you need to know. In order to win the war on the battle for the physical proof. Over the two atom model of gravity. You have to pick your fights. Pick your battles in places that you know your going to win . Even before you start.

     Your going to have to build the two atom model of gravity from the ground up. From scratch. You don't start out at level of gravity. First things first and last things last. The order in which you proceed. Where do you start at? You would first have build the physical proof of String Field Theory. The bad part is this. There are no such things as strings found in nature. We have the math of strings. But no strings. This is good, because your not looking for strings. What your looking for are "Tubes" The forming of tubes in nature is a phenomenon that takes place naturally. Tubes are real. They are common in nature. Real common. There every where. There every where. Free space negative lens are real. They have this natural ability to form light in the shape of tubes. And these tubes that form naturally in nature are scale invariant. This means that they come in big sizes and middle sizes and little bitty sizes. I call this the Goldilocks and the Three Bears syndrome. It's hard to study the big one and it's hard to study the little bitty ones. But the ones in the middle range are just right size for studying. Not to big. Not to small. Just the right size for studying and breaking them down and finding what they are really like. This is where you start at. This is where you pick your first big fight. This is a battle that your going to win. By studying the tubes formed by free space negative lens in simple optics. You can find out about the great big ones (wormholes) and the little bitty tiny ones. (The so called strings.) Some thing really great and wonderful happened when I was studying free space negative lens. I not only found out about wormhole and strings. I found out what the true shape of a atoms are really like. One of those little pieces of the puzzle, that you would have to know about in order to solve the mystery of gravity. In order to find out about wormholes. You first have to find out what gravity is, and how it works. It is the tube part of atoms that form the membrane that makes up the shape of the worm. You have to find out about strings or tubes, membranes, and the true shape of atoms in order to find out about gravity.

     So, if you took all this info and through it out on the table. And arranged it in some kind of order. A time line. or Road map. First things first and last things last. The order of operation or the order of procedure. This is what it should look like. And this is my up date on what I've been studying. Now I'm posting it so every body can see.

(1) study costic sheets of light
     By studying costic sheet of light we can prove that membranes are composed of many small tubes. Membranes are multiverse.
    Prove that tubes can rest in two different place in space at the same time. That they can rest in many different places in space at the same time. Proves that multiverse universe are real. This goes a little bit beyond parallel universes. Some thing that point like particle can't to. But take on the nature of strings. And are able to do what we know that point like objects can't do. At this point you have to ask your self the Question. "What is real hear?" The string is what is real. The particle is just an side effect of vibrating strings. A particle can't express it's self like a string. But on the other hand. Strings can express their self like a point like object. I told you the answer. Just in case you are having trouble with the question. Or the right answer.
    Prove that all tubes are composed of membranes
    Prove that all tubes are multiverse. Due to the fact that all tubes are composed of membranes and all membranes are multiverses.
    prove that membranes have fringes. (free bee} And what caused the fringe pattern to form is due to the polarizing effect of difracted light by the yet smaller tubes that all multiverse membranes are composed of. And again you have to ask your self the question. "What is real hear?" A string can express it's self like a wave. But a wave can't express it's self like a string. The string is what is real.
     Use polorized screen with holographic film. to prove that strings are really there and they can be turned on and off.
    use the above info to prove that when you test very small strings. And use polorizes screen to turne on and off the strins ability to form fringes (or form packets....or form particles.}
     There two very imporant parts of the puzzle of gravity that we have to prove in order to sole the mystery of gravity. 1 That strings are real and 2 that they really do vibrate.
     The fact that you have just united string field theory with main stream science The particle - wave duality. Is a free bee. And the fact that you have just used a particle detector to prove that strings are real. It also makes a statement. Using particle detectors to prove that strings are real. Then the use of a particles detector to detect particles is not indirect evidence that strings are real . But direct evidence that strings are real. No multiverse tube = no vibrating strings = no particle. There is no way around it. This is some thing that we haven't done yet. But are going to have to do. I'll show you the way to do it.

(2) study the shape that free space negative lens can make in simple optics.
    Use particles detector to map out the true shape of a free space negative lens.
    Prove that they have the ability to change their past history. (some thing that a point like particles can't do.}
    Prove that the tubes part of a free space negative lens has change reaction.
    Prove that they are Y-strings. The building blocks of nature.
    Prove that they are closed loop systems.
    Last but not least . Prove that even though they are closed loop system. Due to there shape and the chain of inter cations found there . They are also at the some time acting like open loop system. A system that is able to produce a force due to mass.

(3)Use the info gathered in study's (1) and (2) To solve the mystery of gravity.
     Prove that 1/2 the shape of a free space negative lens is the right shape of the 1/2 a atom.
     Use the building blocks of nature to form A two atom model of gravity.
     Use the two atom model of gravity as the building blocks of gravity and solve the mystery of gravity. The fact that you have just united string field theory with the particle - wave duality and the fact that you just united gravity with the other forces of nature. Is nothing to brag about. Remember. That you weren't smart enough. You had to get Mother Nature to tell you the answer. When you are told the answer. Isn't that a lot like cheating? Yes it is. How is it? It's great. Ounce the cat is out of the bag. There is no putting him back in again.

use the info found out about gravity in study (3) Use the tube part of the atom. It's gravitational field. And use them to form the membranes that wormholes are made out of. A wormhole is a tube. A gravitational free space negative lens. All tubes are multiverses. All tubes are composed of membranes. All membranes are composed of yet smaller tubes. Now where do the smaller tubes come from that make up the membranes that make up what a wormhole is? The tube part of the atom. It's gravitational field. Many tubes. The mass of all the tubes part of all the atoms in the universe.

Use the info found in study's (1), (2), (3), and (4) To tell us what a wormhole is and why we can get one to form. I wasn't smart enough again. I had to be told. How to form a wormhole. The only people that know for sure. How to get a wormhole to form. Are the ones. That are all ready forming wormholes. The sad thing is that they know how to get one to form. They don't know what they are for sure. and How they work. Well just how are we going to find out what makes them work? I don't know. THAT WHAT YOUR HEAR FOR.

Now that we have a wormhole in the lab. We get to run test on them to see if our theories are right or not. And just how it effects gravity in just such a way that you can use a worm hole to manipulate gravity.

    The membranes are composed of a sub-structure to them. They are made of yet smaller [string ] tubes. I have believed that the membranes of the tubes were composed of smaller tubes due to the fringe pattern on the membranes thought that what was being illuminated in the sheets of light was the membrane. This is not true. What is being illuminated is the smaller tube that the membranes are made of. The human eye is a resonator. You can see the costic sheets of light when they form on the inside of the eye ball. When light goes through the liquid of your eye that is on your eye lid. The light will form long lines that seem to come out of the top of the light that you are looking at. Glare. They look like string or tubes. But their not. This is a fringe pattern. Fringe lines have wiggly edges to them. But off to the left and right, you can see some other membranes of light. This is caused by the light that is diffract ed by your eye lashes. They form membranes that do not have a fringe pattern in them The tubes run parallel to each other. But One night when I was diffractions pattern. My eyes started to mat up The irregular of the mat caused a lens action. A negative lens. And when the light from the diffract ed light from my e3ye lashes pasted through the mat. The parallel line that the parallel tubes were making crossed path. It allowed me to see the individual tube that the membranes are made of. They come out and curved back { a 180} and went back to the focal point from which they came. It looked like a egg beater. A whisk. When they come out and made the curve ,I could see the individuals tubes. and expressed no singes of a fringe pattern. But if you looked at where the all came back to a point There appears of membrane that had a fringe pattern in it. This means that the fringe pattern that we have been seeing for all these years is not due to the constructive and destructive patterns of waves. But the polarizing effect of diffractions light of the tubes the membranes are composed of. The wave function of the universe is really due to tubes. (strings)

    Which brings us to this. If you can see the individual tubes that membranes are made . Wouldn't it be interesting to see what a tube does When the information of a particle passes down one. If it does what the big tubes. It will form a fringe pattern that will move down the string. Because if it is really a tube. The the membranes that form the tube will be made of yet smaller tubes.. In order for the fringe pattern to move the tubes that form their fringe pattern will have to move. You could say that they giggle. OR you could say that they resonate. You could even go so for to say that they vibrate. We are nothing more that vibration found in higher dimensional space. The tube would be very small relative to the wave function of the string. This means that the fringe pattern would be just as long as it is wide. You could say that the fringe pattern is causing the tube to break up into little bands. You could say that the string is breaking up into little packets. You could even go so far as to say that the strings are forming particles. Out rages. Imposable. The little tubes have the natural ability to express their self as a wave or a particle. The wave particle duality? It gets worst. If the tube forms a very short tube {bubble} {atom} When the strings vibrate when ever there is a interaction. The fringe pattern will move It is expressing it's self in a timely faction and is also expressing singes of mass. Atomic clocks pulse. So what does the fringe pattern found in membranes and tubes of light. Have to do with mass and time and space . A lot. What does this have to do with gravity. Or even build a proof of gravity? A Lot. Lot. Lot. For this reason When you look at the fringe pattern in sheets of light. They are a standing wave. They do not move. They are not related in time they are not expressing any singes of mass. It is only when there is a interaction when they move. When a particle is adsorbed or an interaction happens This is the key to developing a physical proof of gravity. When there is an interaction with in the membranes of a atom. The strings {little tube. } have to vibrate. They are expressing singes of mess. The same strings that vibe rat in atoms that give atoms their solid state {knock on wood} It's real. Atoms are real. Is the same mass that is used by the atom to create a force that allow them to move. There are not two kinds of strings found in the membranes that make up atom The same strings that vibrate That makes atoms solid like is the very same strings. make them move or create a force Gravity. Atoms are real. Gravity is also real. What is real about gravity. Tubes. Tubes are real. I got pictures. Light can express it's self as a tube naturally in nature. Here's the bad news. Strings vibrate. Strings are nouns. Vibrate. is a verb. Gravity is a verb, it is not a noun. Those poor scientist down there have been looking for gravity {the noun} for the past 150 years. And now we find out at this late date and time. A sad state of affairs. That it is not a noun but a verb. Nature fails to play fair. Nature as been playing man for a fool, for all these years and man has been nun the wiser.

     That doesn't bother me nun. So lets get back to gravity. Are the tubes we find in nature the tubes of string field theory. Or are they the tubes of General relativity? In nature tubes are tubes. They all work the same way. But where you find them in nature. They take on different rolls. And cause different effect. They perform different rolls and functions. The tubes are the building blocks of nature. Because when they form there is a interaction that takes place. You could prove this if you could find a free space negative lens that forms in slow motion in nature like it does in whirlpool in shallow water. You can get a particle detector in water to map out its shape and track the interactions of the particle. By finding out that all tubes go through this interaction. You can use them as building blocks of nature. Y-strings. And build the two atom model of gravity. Then if you use the two atom model of gravity as the building block of gravity.

     This one model of gravity has room enough in for General Theory of Relativity. The membranes that make up the geometrical shapes of the space that rest between atoms. And it also has enough room for this other theory of gravity. What roll does the atoms play in gravity. The origin of the force comes from atoms. You can't have gravity in nature with curvature of space . You can't have gravity with just atoms. The origins of the force. You have to have both. The membranes that make up the geometric shapes of atoms and the membranes that make up the geometric shapes of the space that rest between the atoms. Einstein's two atom universe has both. That why it works. By using the building blocks of gravity {the two atom universe that comes all in tack. The space that rest between the atoms, is accounted for and it's roll or function is in play. The only part of the gravitation field that is real is where these membranes form at in nature relative to the observer , the atoms. This one on one atom is the way it works in nature. The membranes do not go out in every direction. The membranes only form where the membranes form in the negative lens that only forms between atoms.

    The things we need to be working on or talking about are parallel universe , We need to explain negative lens in a way as parallel universes. " It's relative" "The observer determines the out come of the experiment." The particles and the membrane shear a common ancestor. The history of the membrane relative to the observer and the history of the particles. relative to the observer are one and the same. Particles are point like . They can not alter their past history. Membranes are not point like. They have the ability to chance their past history. Both histories of the membrane relative to both observer can be real at the same time. Some thing we call parallel universes. The history of a membrane and one particle can be different from the history of a different observer need to explain a way atom in the way they express their self as parallel universes. The history of an egg shaped atom that points to one observer can also at the same time point it's egg shape at an other observer. It like having two egg shaped atom resting in the same space at the same time but it's the same atom. The phenomenon is what we call parallel universes. The two types of strings Vibrating strings and reciprocating strings. Two types of membranes. One membrane made of vibrating strings and one type of membrane made of reciprocating strings. We haven't talked about all the different ways the two types of strings can connect together. Do they perform in a timely faction or are the not related in time? We haven't talked about Self propelled atoms., what does the negative lens have to do with the force that atom produce? The negative lens provides a place where their is a inter action.. It provides a way for the atom to produce a force. The negative lens provides a way for the force to very it's strength. and because the lens all way form on the back side . It determines in what direction the force will form. The membrane of atom will not produce a force. They have to be made up of yet smaller object. Vibrating strings. The gravitational fields as the geometric shapes of negative lens. Worm Holes The ones that are made by 90% of the mass of the universe. Are negative lens also. We haven't talked about the space that has no mass that forms on the inside of the inside vortex. I used two penny to make the membranes of the negative lens that forms between two objects like two atoms. The gravitational field. If there is enough mass between two pennies to form the meme brains of a real worm hole If their is enough mass in the membranes between two objects like two pennies. To form a worm hole. Then there is enough mass in the membranes that form the negative lens of the gravitational field. that rest between two atoms to have curvatures of time and space or General relativity.

    Every thing keep coming back to negative lens. The building blocks of nature. This should be telling every body some thing. The key to solving the two atom universe. Is solve the mystery of negative lens. We don't know enough about negative lens and where they form in nature to solve the mystery of gravity.

    We only need to solve the mystery of 1/2 of a negative lens in order to solve the hole mystery of negative lens. Because when it comes to negative lens , two half make a hole. One half does the same thing as the other half. Man can not solve the mystery of a hole negative lens. But he can solve the mystery of 1/2 of a negative lens. And this is all we can solve. But good news This is all we need to solve to get the hole negative lens.

    Every thing is resting on one simple experiment. We can produce supporting evidence. By way of the mirage generating experiments that I do. We can also produce evidence by using transit holograms Like Rosen did. We can find out what shape the negative lens makes. But what we haven't been able to do is find out what particles the membranes are expressing their self as. produce. Where about's in the membrane does the inter action take place. If we can find out what particles are there. The negative lens aligns it’s self with spin theory. The same particles that are found in spin theory are the same particles found on the front side of atoms. Which in turn align it's self with Ed Witten's. Famous pair of paints . The building blocks of atoms. If I can rotate the transit light of negative lens because it is relative to the observer. We can do the same thing with a atom. If you turn a atom side ways Instead of being round it will be egg shaped. And will have a worm hole on the back side. If the worm hole is to small is see. You can take a positive lens a and magnify the info the light has in it of the negative lens and activated it by using a positive lens. If the information can be found in the very center of the atom and no where else. Then the theory is true. We know that all negative lens has an interaction take place in them We know that all atom have an interaction in them But what we don't know is what shape does the atom produce on the back side where this interaction takes. All we need to do is prove is that the shape is a negative lens to prove the theory.

    Now back to the experiment. What I have found out is when water forms turbulence some times it will form a vortex. If there is a light over head like sun light. The light that passes through the water will form a positive lens. But this positive lens will shape shift and form a tube in the middle the same thing it does when two positive lens meet in the middle of a negative lens a Vortex with in a vortex. The tattle tall sing of the black dot is there. When a positive lens forms a point. A point of light forms. When a positive lens forms a tube with in the tube. or a 1/2 vortex with in the membranes of the positive lens It forms a very large black dot. There is your difference. Now when a negative lens forms You can't find out what is happen 1/2 in the negative lens because it is relative When you are at the 1/2 mark the light performs like a positive lens. It is only when you are at the other end does the light form a negative lens. It's relative. You can't use a particle detector to prove that the interaction is taking place. You can prove what is happening with a particle detected in the positive lens. What is good to know about the positive lens that is forms by vortex in water. Is the positive lens performs like 1/2 of a negative lens. This means that if you put a one membrane slitter in the bottom of the tank so the light will shine through the bottom of the tank. And below that you place a parabolic mirror. A concave curved mirror. The positive lens will then perform like it does when it form in a negative lens. Why do all of this? Why? You can not use a particles detector to prove what is happening at the 1/2 way mark in a real free space negative lens. But if you can find a way to get a positive lens to perform the same way it does in a real free space negatives lens. You can use a particles detector to map out the geometrical shapes that it makes. You can prove that it goes through the different shapes that it makes in the life cycle. You can prove that there is an inter action taking place with the particles. And what particles are being produce. And align it with spin theory. and where it is taking place. Because the shape shifting is taking place in a slow timely faction You can use a particles detector to map out what shape it is making. How much mass it has Etc. Etc. With this experiment There is nothing that is happening in the negative lens that you can't prove with a particles detector and very accurate clocks. Verifiable by know scientific means. The right shape of the building blocks of nature.

    If you have with in your hand every thing there is to be know about the building blocks of nature and where they form in nature you can solve the two atom universe and solve Einstein's G.U.T.

    All you need is one atom and 1/2 of the negative lens.

    But it get's better Because the shape of 1/2 the two atom universe is in such a way that you can drew a line through the center of the shape. and cut it by half again.

    But it gets even better. The shape can be drawn out as a 2d line drawing.. mathematical slops. A circle,a oval or egg shape , a positive lens shape and last but not least the shape of inverse vortex.

    Most high school math students can do the math to all of these lines that make up these curved lines or slopes.

    There is a mathematical proof and a physical proof to the two atom universe. When it comes to developing a physical proof . It's the only game in town. Why? This is the way it happens in nature. The simple two atom universe is the only way it can work. This is the way it all works. the way it is in our universe or the world we live in , in our every day lives.

    This means that space is curved in two different direction at the same time. Gravity is a two way street. It's able to do this because the history of the membranes that each atom is seeing is the only membranes that are real to him. and in just what way space is curved will determine in which direction the other atom will move or produce a force.

    A negative lens is the only thing found that has the ability to curve space in two directions at the same time But relative to each atom they are not connected. But relative to a observer standing half way between the atoms and back away from them they are connected You can see the worm hole. The negative lens. Not only do negative lens have the ability to covers space in two directions at the same time. It can also connect the two atoms together. But there is one more thing that has to happen. the negative lens can also have a particle reaction. It can fracture in the middle and form two halves. A vortex with in a vortex. The inside vortex is different from the out side vortex. The out side vortex has fringes, and the inside vortex does not. Membranes that have fringes , have vibrating strings and the membranes that do not have reciprocating strings. So there is a lot going on with in a negative lens action.

    There is a mathematical solution to the two atom universe. The right shape of the atom is a egg shape with a worm hole in the back. But the right shape of the space that rest in between the atoms. is that of a negative lens. Space can be curved in two directions at the same time. and at the same time it connects both atoms together. This is the way it is in nature. Two positive lens when combined together, form a negative lens the two positive lens are part of a bigger hole The negative lens. A person standing in between the two atoms would see a negative lens. But relative to each atom what they would see is not a negative lens but a positive lens and that the observer is not connected to it.

    So Einstein's two atom universe is correct due to the fact that gravity is relative. And what makes relativity work is parallel universes. Different membrane with different shapes and different history. and different spaced that is curved in different directions. Relative to each individual observer. But if you try to get the math to add up !!!! It doesn't. It's not supposed to. Every truck driver knows that if you get your trucks transition such in two different gears at the same time . It will lock up. It works fine if it is in one gear or the other But not in two at the same time. Space is the same way. The same thing that allows it to work in one universe at a time. is the same thing that keeps the gears from grinding. It is also the same thing that will for ever bar man from being able to get the math to work. Parallel universes. Your probable thinking . " Now what kind of world or science is it, that in which the math doesn't add up?" " One that works." You use the logic of parallel universe. Relative to each observer the math works perfect. It exceeds the accuracy of one part in one billion. You add the effect or the force of each atom relative to every atom.

    This is what allows gravity to produce a force in two different directions at the same time. Because it has a geometrical shape. This means that there is a mathematical proof to the Einstein's two atom universe.

    But in order to get gravity to work like it does in nature. You would have to get the three atom universe to work. If you can get the three atom universe to work. Then you can get a universes to work regardless of how many atom their are in the universe or how few. Just as long as it does go below the three or the two atom universe. Universe that have only one atom can not have gravity.

    In order to have a three atom universe. Not only the space That rest between the atoms. Would have to have the ability to be curved in two direction at the same time. But the atoms would also have to have the ability to produce a force in two directions at the same time.

    Einstein knew that if he could unity the strong and weak nuclear forces with the electro magnet force. That you could show that all the forces of nature are some how, in some way connected together. His G.U.T.

    One day I was copying some negative lens in the back. in it. But when I copped the pictures. The pattern was gone. I took the picture out of the copier. I still couldn't see ant fringe pattern. I know the picture had the fringe pattern in it because that is why I choose it. I was thinking what had happen was impossible. I took the picture out side in the sun light to look at it. The fringe pattern was back The polarized light was turning the black in the picture back on. When people make hologram have found out that when you take the film of a hologram and cut it so you can look at the side view of the film. They found that the membranes of the light had little squiggly line in it . But the lines are fragmented. If I can turn the light back on in a picture. Them this means that I could also turn the light or lines back on in a hologram. This tells me that the fringe pattern formed in the membranes of light is not caused but th constructive and destruction wave pattern of light but by the polarize of light by strings. That are over lapping each other. Vibrating strings. Strings that have no fringe pattern in them are not vibrating. They are reciprocating. But if I can turn back on the light with a polarized screen. I could record the shape of a hole string in the film of a hologram. This means that membranes are composed of vibrating strings. This means that if a atom are composed of membranes. membranes a lone will not make a atom move. But a atom composed of vibrating strings can Vibrate strings rest in three dimensioned space. And are curves in a circle. All that is required in order for a string to produce a force like centrifugal force. There is no point like object in atoms. They are constructed 100% as membranes and strings. And geometrical shapes.

    Every thing in the universe is made of matter. If it is not made of matter. It does not exist. If it does not exist. Then it is not real. Just what part of gravity is it that man does not under stand? The part that is real. Every thing that we find in the universe, that is real, is composed of particles. Matter. Objects and the two kinds of space that rest in between objects. The space that can be detected , simple light or simple optics and the mass of the particles that makes up the space that can not be detected as particles, space optics. This is the way the universe is made.

    And the particles that make up the geometrical shapes of the field energy of the 2-D flat space that make up the atoms of objects their self. What place in the universe is the forces of gravity being produces? And by what particle? And in what way is the force being produced? Where is the source of the force?

    Why is this so? When Newton stated the An object that is in motion will remain in motion, unless acted upon by an out side force. Which is true. But when Newton said "out side force" Every body took it for granite that the force that makes objects move, would be found in the space on the out side of objects. The space that rest between objects.

   Of all of the mass of the universe. Only 10% is detectable. The stars and planets make up 9.9 % of this mass..and the particles that make up the space that rest in between objects make up .1% of this detectable mass. But 90% of the mass that rest between objects and can not be detected. But the effects of it can be detected by an indirect way. This mass is like an unseen ocean. If we could make a bubble to form in this unseen ocean. A bubble that would have no mass. The same as bubbles that form in water have no water on the inside of them. Then it could be detected due the effect it would have on objects.

   For years we have know that. If objects are every going to move. They will have to move their self under their on power. Einstein said that when you fall. You can't feel the effects of gravity on your body. There is probably a simple reason for this.

   Einstein said that gravity is like a boat drifting down a river. Which is one way of stating gravity. The other way would be to say that the water of the river is not moving and the boat is moving down the river under it own power. That the boat is self propelled. Again the odds are 50/50. Either the water is moving or it is not. At this late date and time we find that there is no movement of the particles that make up the space that rest between objects. That would make objects move the way that they do in nature. This means that atoms are the source of the force.

   But the forces of centrifugal force produced by the mass of the electron found in atoms. If it could produce more force on one side of the atom than it does on the opposite, or other side. It could produce a force that is equal to the strength of the force. Like that seen in nature.

   They are like little perpetual motion machines. The electron never runs down. The force of gravity never runs down. Well almost never, Give or take 12 billion years. Take the electron out of an atom. The force of gravity goes away. Put the electron back in the atom and gravity comes back. There is probably a simple reason for this.

  Because the electron is not at rest. It is traveling at a very fast speed. It has speed, inertia and mass. It is also going in a circle. Because the electron has mass The electron is also producing centrifugal force. The electron is producing centrifugal force on all sides. Because the centrifugal force is equal on all side the atom does not move. And as along as the force is equal on all side it will not move. It is at rest.

   In order to find out what is happening in the atom . In order for it to produce the force. One would have to find all of the ways that the mass of the electron is turned off and turned on again. At the quantum level where we find the electron in atoms. The rules change. The electron can turn off and on it's mass.

   There is three ways that the electron {Which has mass } can turn off and on it's mass. The electron must make use of all three ways in order for the atom to move They are (1) inline locks. (2) tunneling, Photon (3) a hole.

  (1) A inline lock is like two weights on the end of a string that is spinning around so that the weights are producing centrifugal force. That keeps the weights pulling in opposite direction. And holds the system open or apart. The string holds the weights together. A inline lock is a form of kinetic energy. The forces on the string after it forms does not change. The centrifugal force produced by the spinning weights is not turned off. The forces are in opposite direction. And the centrifugal forces of each weight is canceled out. The canceling out of the centrifugal forces of each weight = equals to the same thing as if the mass of each weight has been turned off. The same is true for the bubble like shape of a atom. The bubble now becomes the inline lock Taking on the roll of the string.

   Now that we have things to where it is as if we have turned off the mass of the electron of an atom. The trick now becomes. How do we turn it back on again?

   If you take the string and the two weights. Out in to deep space and you gave it a toss and set it spinning. The inline lock would not move Because the forces are equal on all sides. But if one of the weights vanished. The other weight would no longer goes in a circle. It would now move in a straight line. The laws of nature dictates that it does so. You can test this your self . You can take a weight on the end of a string and spin it around. Let the string go, and the weight does not continue to go in a circle. It will now move in a straight line In an inline lock. Turning off mass on one side of the system. Turns on, the 180 degrees out, centrifugal force on the opposite side. How is this done in nature.

   The other two remaining way can be study in nature by studying free space Gaussian beam optics. Free space negative lens. Einstein - Rosen bridges. Worm holes. Y-strings the building blocks of nature. There all the same thing. They all fracture in the middle and form two halves.

   Einstein once said that the most likely place to find an Einstein - Rosen bridge would be between the inside and the out side membranes of an atom. Einstein - Rosen bridges are made out of a space that is related in time and the electron has mass. But when Wheeler came out with his worm hole that are made out of a space that is not related in time. And the electron does not have mass. This is the point where Einstein put two and two together. He ran around all day lone saying some thing about this Grand Unity Theory. And mumbling about something to the effect that ? It is all as one.? Why is this? There is probably a simple reason for this.

   There are two types of 2-D flat space. One is a Einstein type of space that is related in time. And the other type of 2-D space is a Wheeler?s type of space. It is not related in time. When time goes to zero space becomes infinity. And all information of the electron is lost. When the electron is forming this type of 2-D flat space the electron has no mass. Free space negative lens form two types of space membranes. A vortex with in a vortex. The out side membrane is related in time and has fringes in it. The inside membrane at one point, is not related in time. It has no fringes in it . It is smooth. Here is where the electron tunnels, and expresses no sings of mass. The inside of the inside vortex is hollow. It is a dead zone. Where the probability of detecting the electron there is zero. The type of space that forms the worm hole between the inside bubble and the out side bubble is a Wheeler space. This type of space does not express any form of mass.

   (2) This is where the electron tunnels in between the inside and outside of the bubbles of the atom. Tunneling = no mass.

   (3) And the other way that the mass of the electron is turned off is the hole. Wheeler?s type of worm hole. There is no electron there to be found. It?s a hole. Holes are just that. There is nothing there to be found. A space that where the probability of detecting a electron is zero. Zero electron = zero mass. Or no mass.

   If you put a weight on the end of a string and spin it around. You can feel the weight and the centrifugal force being produced by the object. The object has mass. Take the object off the end of the string and spin the string around by it?s self. And the weight the mass and the centrifugal force that was once there is now gone. Turn off The same is true about electron found in worm holes that form in atoms No electron = no mass. No mass = no centrifugal force. The atom is now producing more force on one side than it is on the other. There is nothing found in nature to stop the atom from moving.

   If the electron is producing centrifugal force on all sides. And if it produces more force on one side than it does the other it will move. If the electron retains it's mass on one side of the atom and turns it's mass off by some way. ????

   Inline locks when expressed in their higher dimensional forms. They are like a loop or a bubble. They have to be looked upon as closed loops. A spinning closed loop will not produce a force. A spinning loop that has a fixed section of the loop missing on one side and not the other.. Will produce a force. You can take a loop of some thing say the v-belt off your lawn mower. If you spin it around it will not move. You can take the same belt and form a circle C shape out of the belt with pulleys and ideal rowers. There is a 2-d shape of a vortex forming where the two ends of the C shape almost meet. You can spin the belt as fast or slow as you like. But it will not move. It is a loop. A closed loop. The forces are still equal on all sides. It will not move.

   In an atom. The field energy always forms a closed loop system. Because there are two kinds of space that the atom is composed of. One expresses mass and the other does not. The atom can function as a closed field energy loop and an open loop system expressed as mass At the same time.

   The rest of the atom is still forming a force on all side. And is not relevant to the force.

    How does Einstein?s General Relativity work together with Feynman?s Machine. The real part of gravity.

    Addressing the problem of uniting Einstein's General Relativity with Feynman's quantum electro dynamics. The two different theories are united by way of the shape of the atom. Like it does in nature.

   The same particles that make up the field energy that makes up the space between objects. Is also the same particles that make up the field energy that makes up the space that forms atoms. It's is not two different field energies. There is only one field energy. They both act together as one in separable hole. When the geometrical shape of one changes. The strength of the force of the atoms changes by the same amount.

   In simple optics I have seen the shapes of bubbles form on the inside of two vortex mouth to mouth. In simple optics, the mass of the shape of the vortex is equal to the energy of the shape of the bubble that forms there. This means that if the space that rest in between objects has just as much energy or mass as the space that the objects have. When the Tube part of the atom, that form in between atoms change. The strength of the force produced by the atoms will change by the same amount. What makes the shape of the space change is the mass and size and distance that the other object has that the first object to being attracted to and vise versa.

   There is no such thing as gravity in nature. Gravity is really a verb. It is a unit of work. You can't find gravity in nature. You can find in nature, the centrifugal force produced by the speed, inertia and mass of the electron found in atoms. Centrifugal force and the gravitational force are not two different forces they are the same force. Centrifugal force and gravity are one and the same. They are part of an inseparable hole.

   About Einstein?s GUT If it is the mass of the electron that is producing the force. Centrifugal force. Then the gravitation force and the electromagnetic force automatically become united together as one.

   Two different aspects of the same thing. The electron. To have some thing like gravity in nature. You just can't look at just one of the aspects of the electron. You have to look at what is happening in the hole dynamics of both factors. The big picture of the atoms. The binding force of the photon holds the atom together due to it's charge, and the centrifugal force of the mass of the electron holds the atom open. The binding force of the electromagnetic force is pitted against the speed, inertia and the mass of the electron. Because the force can be tracked back to the binding force due to it's charge. One aspect of the force. The photon particle. And the forces of the electron due to it's speed, mass and inertia. Which gives us Centrifugal force. The other aspect of the electron. You have to look at what the space that rest in between object is doing as well as the space that make up objects. The big picture.

   And the shape that the field energy is making is very important. With out the right shape The system will not produce a force.

   The photon is the carrier of the electron. For every electron the is a photon associated with it. The photo - electric effect Glue balls.

   The best part of this theory is that we have a particle to work with. The theory can be tested in the lab. The same laboratory equipment need to develop the physical evidence is also the same laboratory equipment needed to develop a technology to manipulate the gravitational force. The people that work on the theory will be the first to find ways to manipulate the force.

   8/25/07 up date; For the past year I have been talking to a lot of people on the internet about the two atom system of gravity. E-mails etc. etc. You may want to see what was said so I'm posting most of them her so that you can easily read what was said. They want let me post every thing that was said. But most of it I can. It may help you develop a better picture of what gravity is like and how it works in nature. Larry

    (A) The mass of the electron found in the atom. (2) What all has to be there in the two atom system of gravity. In order for it to work? Answer (A) One building block of gravity. (B)Two atoms and a gravitational field. (C)Four building blocks of nature. (D) All of the above.

    There are objects the we refer to being point like object. We express them as being in three dimensions of space. And one of time. We usually refer to them as being point like because there movement can be expressed with three dimensions of space and one of time. There are rules that point like objects fellow. There are thing that point like objects can do. And there are things that point like objects can not do. Things seem to be working all right till the point like objects start doing things that we know that point like objects can not do. When ever a objects is accelerated it produces a force. We call the force that the object is producing mass. Electrons produce a force when ever they are accelerated. When they are at rest they don't produce a force. This is the way that point like objects are supposed to work. And every thing goes all right. Atoms are like point like objects. Up to a point. At times they act just like electrons act. When every a atom is excelarated they produce mass. When a atom is at rest. It doesn't produce a force. But there is some thing that a atom can do that a electron can not do. It can be at rest and at the same time produce a force. It is at this point that every thing goes to hell in a hurry. In a hand basket. The electron. The atom. But are said to be point like objects. But then again there are times when they don't perform like point like objects. Point like objects can not produce a force due to it's mass when at rest. Like the electron. But the atom can So what is the difference between the two? The atom may have the treats of point like objects. but point like objects they are not. The look like bubbles. That are smeared out over time and space. They are three dimensional objects. They rest in three dimensions of space. They are composed of membranes. The membranes have a sub structure to them. The electron particle. The info of the electron particle found in the atom is not at rest. It is related in time. It is moving very fast. At the speed of light. If the electron is being accelerated because it is moving in a circle. It will produce a force. Due to it's mass. Due to the centrifugal force produced by the electron. Then the atom has a means by which it can move by. Atom may have the treats of a point like objects. But point like objects they are not. Atoms are a system. A closed loop system. The electron moves as a repeating cycle thought the closed loop system. The system is dynamic and compound. It is a compound complex system. Atoms are not simple spheres. Well every thing is going all right up to a point. Then we find out that the point like nature of electrons are not so point like after all. WE find them doing what point like objects can not. So what wrong with our electrons. They to are truly not point like objects. They to are the end produce of a the dynamic of a sub system. Called strings. Point like objects can take on the traits of strings. because particles are composed off a substructure that is composed of strings. Strings can express their self as point like objects. This is why point like particles can do what we know that point like objects can not do. That's because they are no made of point like objects. They are made of strings. Well The string thing is going all right up to a point. Then we find out that strings don't break up into point like objects. They are string. Strings do not break up into units. Strings are unbroken units unto their self. Independent unto their self's many strings. So what,s wrong here. They to are function as a compound complex dynamic system. There is a primary function and a secondary function. And a final function. The crosshatch pattern produced by the strings ( more than three strings)is the primary function. The info of the space. ( the secondary function) That diffract's due to the mass of the string. The diffracted space goes on to produce a membrane. The membrane is now broken up into units due to the polarizing effects of the crosshatched strings. That is broken up. The final effect. The info of the particle. This is one huge part of the puzzle. Of the mystery of gravity. Man will have to get this part of nature right before he will be able to solve the mystery of gravity. So. Lets put it all in a nut shell. The earth and all other objects. Are point like. They have the treats of point like objects. But at times they are able to perform in a manner the is not characteristics of point like objects. They can produce a force when they are at rest. Why They are composed of a sub structure called atoms. Atoms have the traits of point like objects. But they can produce a force at rest. Why Atoms have a sub structure called electrons. Electrons are not at rest. They have the ability to produce a force. Electrons. Are point like. But are able to do the things that point like objects can not. Because they to also have a sub structure to them. Called strings String are able to do thing that strings can not do a line due to the fact that strings are only part of a dynamic system composed of three parts. Strings the geometry of polarized rays of light the arrow of time. And the fragmented membrane. There are three or more different ways the fragmented membranes can express it's self as a point like objects. It can travail down a tube. It can move around a half sphere as a lot of ever collapsing rings. It can express it's self as a tube the forms between two membranes.. There tubes that are the carriers of the info of particles that never express there self as particles. And are not related in time. If in the end it is found out that the lowly electron is the source of the force of gravity. The four forces of nature become united as a given. A free bee. It becomes united by default. Blatantly obvious. Some truths are self evident. Simple and Beautiful. You can't unite some thing that is all ready united. If this is true. Then what we need to be doing is finding a way to tell the difference forces apart form one another. I believe we have all ready did this. "Two different aspects of the same thing. One force due to it's charge. One force due to it's mass. The electron." Richard P. Feynman

   The orbs. They are like the calling cards of field energy. They appear all the time in nature. http://www.ufoworkshop.0catch.com/Show%20and%20Tell.html Click here and go take a closer look at these pictures. In the top picture. You can see the field energy forming them. But if you go down to the bottom picture and look at the right side of the membrane. There are two orbs. Now what is causing these orbs to form is because there is either some thing there that has mass or there is some thing there that has no mass. You get the same lens effect with both. Mass and the absent of mass. Look at this picture. In the mouth of the wormhole. In the lower right hand side of the worm hole. The membrane is interacting with some thing. See how it kind of hooked up. There is nothing there. This is why it is black. Now look at this picture. There are two of these black hole in it. I have no ideal of why they are there. Or what purpose they serve. The point I'm trying to make is. Gravity is composed of field energy. If there is some thing that is around. May be some thing that you can't see right off. A lot of time. These orbs will start to form. Some times the UFO is hidden behind one of the orbs. Wormhole form orbs. Most of the time you can see the orb part of the wormhole That forms on the center of the mouth. But you can't see the mouth of the wormhole. And there will be several other orbs found near by. Because the UFO is forming a wormhole. How do you think it got here? This is why the people in N.M. are seeing orbs. This is why we are seeing orbs form around the black lines we are now seeing in the sky out west. The black beams in the sky. The black wormholes in the sky. Most of the time if you can see the orbs. They are not more than five miles form you. 25,000 feet. Any further up and you can't see them. The ones that you are seeing are about three miles a way. 15,000 feet. It's hard to see a car at three miles. So if you start seeing orbs. Starting looking around for some thing else that is out of order. It might be a black line or a much bigger orbs. At night. If you go there at night. Some times it will look like a small dot of light. Some times it will look like a tube of light. It can change it's shape from one thing to some thing else.

   Hidden UFO base Finding UFO's is a lot like going fishing. If you want to see UFO'S. You have to go where the UFO live at. There base. Or where they hang out at. Having a place where you go to see UFO's. Is like having a secret fishing hole. Nanook. Do you thank they would bust us if i told every body here where if have found a secret UFO base. I was able to down load pictures of the base from satellite map pictures before they kicked it off the net. I could not get the hole base in one picture. But I do have about eight little pictures of it. Would you want to post them here. So that others can see that the base is real. Should I post where you can go and what time of day you can see the UFO's come up off the ground? Larry

    We are closer that others have lead us to believe. We are close. Very close. It could happen in the twinkle of a eye. It could happen tomorrow. Next week. Soon. It may have all ready happened. Who knows. All it takes is for one man to state it right for the first time. And post his findings before the eyes of the public. It is only required for him to state it right one time. Then the burden of proof. Is on the nay sayer's. If he has got it right by way of the physical evidence of the laws of nature. The nay sayer's will have to use the same physical evidence to prove the theory wrong. If theory is right in every way. Right by way of the laws of nature. You can't turn around and prove the theory wrong using the same laws of nature. The laws of nature are written in stone. They don't change with time. If the theory is right. It will with stand all on comers. All nay sayer's. It will with stand a test of time. It takes a long time to get it right the first time. The act of getting it right can happen in the twinkle of a eye. It takes a long time to Try and prove it wrong. If it is right. If the theory is right. You can try for ever and a day to prove it wrong. And never be able do so. This is a test of time. Written in stone. Dr. Kaku is going to win this bet. Because nature is going to prove Kaku right. Soon There is to much going on right now for it not to happen.

   Nanook: There are some people that clamed that the have detected a photon that moved faster than the speed of light. I don't think this is what is happening in nature. It think some thing else is happening. But this does not mean that there is any thing in the rule book that states that a object that is made of atoms. Can not go faster than the speed of light. There is some thing that states the rockets can not get us up to the speed of light. But gravity is different. Gravity could. Now just because particles are not moving faster than the speed of light, I know of ways of producing physical evidence that no other man up to now has be able to produce. You talk about the black box. That No man nor any laboratory equipment can see in side of. Now we can. This is what I'm doing. This is why there is very little of peer review papers to back up of what is seen in the pictures. It is new. Never done before by man. There is tons of peer review papers to back up how the end results of how the light will perform. But there is no peer review papers on what is happening in between point A and point B. It is a unknown. The black box. I have found out that if you can see the front view of light. You are nun the wiser. A particle detector can tell you every thing that is happen now. At the place in time and space of where the particle detector is at. But it can not tell you any thing about what is happening in the space before you. Before that point. But if you have found a way to see the light from the side view. See in to the black box. Big difference. See nature in places that man has never been seen before. If you can see this part of nature. You can prove what you are saying is right. The bad news is that when you look at this part of the system that nature is producing. It is quick to point out your mistakes. Neil. Want to look inside of the black box? Don't go here if you don't want to see inside of the black box. Don't go here if you don't want to find out the truth. Don't go here if you don't want to find out that you have made mistakes in your papers that you have written. It's all right if you have made mistakes. Mistakes can be easily fixed. This is why we write papers and post the before the eyes of the public. So that may be some one that knows a little about the subject can give you sone feed back. Some insight on what you are trying to do. Some insight to where you are making your mistakes. There are tons of people out there that are quick to point out your mistakes. But very few that are good enough to tell you how to fix your mistakes. But if you go to the Grand Master to find your mistakes. The worlds leading authority on the laws of nature. Mother Nature her self. She is a wicked witch that has a hart that is cold and hard as stone. I can't help you. But mother nature can. Go here first. http://www.ufoworkshop.0catch.com/Show%20and%20Tell.html This is light like that found in nature. It is smeared out over time and space. Higher dimensional space. It is not point like. It is expressing it's self as membranes. If you open up one of these membranes . You will find that they are composed of very small lines. Light in the form of a tube. Strings. Strings can express their self's in parallel universes. The same string can rest in two places in space In many places in space at the same time. And carry the same info of the same particle. The info of one particle. This is what allows the info one particle to have many different histories. And cause a interference pattern with it's self. This is what causes the light to break up. And express their self's as if their are waves. When there are not. To cause the space to break up in just a way. In order for it to express their self's as particles. Ten Dimensional Hyperspace. Sure. It's true. Look for where the light breaks up. And forms a fringe pattern. In the bottom picture. At the close to the top. There are three pictures on this page. if at first they don't come up. click the "Refresh button" in the tool bar at the top, a few times. This should do it. OK. So I lied There is only two pictures here. But the second one from the top. I blew up so that you can get a better look at it. It's two pictures of the same object. When ever a positive lens forms in nature. it will form a focal point. A singularity. but the light does not stop there. it goes on past the focal point and forms a half spherical shaped membrane. Nature proves these people right. About what they are saying about the very close and the very far view of singularity found in nature. What point would that be.? When looked at the focal point from very far a way. The info in the system looks like it all goes to a point and all info is lost. This is true when you are using math. But not true when you are looking at what nature is saying. It is close to a point. But a point it is not. The same would be true about black holes found in the center of galaxies. The first picture is the front view. You can see some cross hatch lines on the back side of the sphere. a particle detector can not detect what is happening behind the walls of the sphere shaped membrane. The black box. But you can't tell what the lines are till you see the side of the shape. The other black box. The side view. When you look at the side view of what is happening. a lot more can be learned about what you are seeing. And when you look at the side view you learn. The the sphere shape that you seen from the front view is not a sphere. It is a semi sphere shape. And the lines as seen from the front view. Turn out to be part of a membrane of the focal point. ( what point? ) We are learning at a very fast pace here. But by looking at the side view. There is some thing else that can be seen. you can see the membranes of the shape. And you are shocked down to your very sole to find out that there two different kinds of membranes. Two different kinds of spaces. If you look at the bottom picture. The big one. You can see the fringe pattern in the semi spherical membranes on top. The way that membranes of light should look like. The only way that man has seen membranes of light like. Then you look at the membrane that the focal point is composed of. Where is the fringe pattern at? It doesn't have one. Light or space is compound. It is composed of two different kinds of space. Space has two different types of functions. One is related in time. The other is not related in time. Your supper fast particles. You fasted than light particles. The membranes that have no fringe pattern in them is the space that is the carrier of the info of your faster than light particles. This is the way that it performs in the lab by way of testing the light. You are right that there is a sub hidden order to the particles. You are looking at it for the first time. It's real. Buy nature is not expressing it's self as a particle. What you see here is membranes. If you open up one of the membranes. You will find that they have a sub order to them. Little tubes that look like lines. The so called strings. You will never to prove the there are fasted than light particles. But you can prove that there is a kind of space that is the carriers of the info of particles that are able to performs " as if" there was a particles that was able to move faster than light. But the only thing that moves faster than light was the info of the particle. By way. By way of the strings. Which did not move at all. Strings are a standing wave. They are in two different places in space at the same time. The very same strings that make up the membrane at the bottom of the picture is the very same strings the makes up the membranes at the stop of the picture. The strings in the membrane at the top do not move either. They vibrate. There is a difference. The very same string that is the carrier of the info of the particle at the bottom of the picture. Is also the very same strings That can experts their self in a timely faction. Having mass and related in time. are able to express their self's as point like objects that can be detected with particles detectors. Strings can expresses their self in two different ways. ALL at the same time. All you need to do in is state it like I just did. Then it's all right to say the space is performing " as if " there are supper fast particles found in nature. And this is the way that nature performs in nature. Nature will prove you right if you start saying " as if " If you say " as if ". It then becomes all right to use the logic of faster than light particles. Because there are ways in the lab to prove what you are saying.

    If you do the spores in the bottle experiment that I told you about. It will produce a very long positive lens. But if you do the same experiment. But this time you use two different light sources. The tubes of the positive lens of the first light source. Will connect up with the tubes of the positive lens of the second light source. And form a very long negative lens. wormhole. If you use sun light from two different sources. Two mirrors. Or the light from the sun and the light from the sun being reflected off one mirror. a And you use two a very small ball of spores. And record what is happening in the experiment with a space shielding hologram made from spores so that the info of the wormhole becomes frozen in time. Written in stone. Use two sources of sun light. It will form a wormhole that has enough mass that it will cut a diamond. The finger of God. Bcause the space shielding effects of the small balls of spores. Not only effect the part of the sun light that has mass. The electrons and radon paritcles. But it also effects the other part of space that you can not detect with a particles detector. But is there. Then the little tube of light has enough mass to form a wormhole. Larry

   Warm: I have found a way the simply fie the tin can spores experiment. a powder puff only has so many spores in it. It would take a lot of powder puff to coat a tin small tin can. But if you had a very small tin can you could use the spores one powder puff. And do the experiment. IF you used the cap off of a lip stick canister. It's has the same shape as a tin can. It would work just as well. and you only need to find one powder puff to have enough spores to do the experiment. larry

   You poor misguided sole. Where are you making your mistake. How can I help you. How can I help you when your this right by nature? I read your paper that you posted a link to. It was 99.9% right. You could rewrite the paper and change the words you use and add a few things that I know about that is happening in nature. About gravity. And be 100% by nature. Your are that close. May be we should co- authored a paper together. You do good work and have the peer review papers to back up your work. I know of ways of producing physical evidence that no other man up to now has be able to produce. You talk about the black box. that No man nor any laboratory equipment can see in side of. Now we can. This is what I'm doing. This is why there is very little of peer review papers to back up of what is seen in the pictures. It is new. Never done be fore by man. There is tons of peer review papers to back up how the end results of how the light will perform. But there is no peer review papers on what is happening in between point A and point B. It is a unknown. The black box. I have found out that if you can see the front view of light. You are nun the wiser. A particle detector can tell you every thing that is happen now. At the place in time and space of where the particle detector is at. But it can not tell you any thing about what is happening in the space before you. Before that point. But if you have found a way to see the light from the side view. See in to the black box. Big difference. See nature in places that man has never been seen before. If you can see this part of nature. You can prove what you are saying is right. The bad news is that when you look at this part of the system that nature is producing. It is quick to point out your mistakes. Neil. Want to look inside of the black box? Don't go here if you don't want to see inside of the black box. Don't go here if you don't want to find out the truth. Don't go here if you don't want to find out that you have made mistakes in your papers that you have written. It's all right if you have made mistakes. Mistakes can be easily fixed. This is why we write papers and post the before the eyes of the public. So that may be some one that knows a little about the subject can give you sone feed back. Some insight on what you are trying to do. Some insight to where you are making your mistakes. there are tons of people out there that are quick to point out your mistakes. But very few that are good enough to tell you how to fix your mistakes. But if you go to the Grand Master to find your mistakes. The worlds leading authority on the laws of nature. Mother Nature her self. She is a wicked witch that has a hart that is cold and hard as stone. If you see this. Your not going to break down and start to cry on me. Are you Neil? I can't help you Neil. But mother nature can. Go here first. http://www.ufoworkshop.0catch.com/Show%20and%20Tell.html There are three pictures on this page. if at first they don't come up. click the "Refresh button" in the tool bar at the top, a few times. This should do it. OK. So I lied There is only two pictures here. But the second one from the top. I blew up so that you can get a better look at it. It's two pictures of the same object. When ever a positive lens forms in nature. it will form a focal point. A singularity. but the light does not stop there. it goes on past the focal point and forms a half spherical shaped membrane. Nature proves George right. About what he was saying about the very close and the very far view of singularity found in nature. What stinking point would that be.? When looked at from very far a way. the info in the system looks like it all goes to a point and all info is lost. This is true when you are using math. but not true when you are looking at what nature is saying. it is close to a point. But a point it is not. The first picture is the front view. You can see some cross hatch lines on the back side of the sphere. a particle detector can not detect what is happening behind the walls of the sphere shaped membrane. The black box. But you can't tell what the lines are till you see the side of the shape. The other black box. When you look at the side view of what is happening. a lot more can be learned about what you are seeing. And when you look at the side view you learn. The the sphere shape that you seen from the front view is not a sphere. It is a semi sphere shape. And the lines as seen from the front view. Turn out to be part of a membrane of the focal point. ( what point? ) We are learning at a fast pace. But by looking at the side view. There is some thing else that can be seen. you can see the membranes of the shape. And you are shocked down to your very sole to find out that there two different kinds of membranes. Two different kinds of space. If you look at the bottom picture. The big one. You can see the fringe pattern in the semi spherical membranes on top. The way that membranes of light should look like. Then you look at the membrane that the focal point is composed of. Where is the fringe pattern at? It doesn't have one. Light or space is compound. It is composed of two different kinds of space. Space has two different types of functions. One is related in time. The other is not related in time. Your supper fast particles. You fasted than light particles. The membranes that have no fringe pattern in them is the space that is the carrier of the info of your faster than light particles. This is the way that it performs in the lab by way of testing the light. You are right that there is a sub hidden order to the particles. You are looking at it for the first time. It's real. Buy nature is not expressing it's self as a particle. What you see here is membranes. If you open up one of the membranes. You will find that they have a sub order to them. Little tubes that look like lines. The so called strings. You will never to prove the there are fasted than light particles. But you can prove that there is a kind of space that is the carriers of the info of particles that are able to performs " as if" there was a particles that was able to move faster than light. But the only thing that moves faster than light was the info of the particle. By way. By way of the strings. Which did not move at all. Strings are a standing wave. They are in two different places in space at the same time. The very same strings that make up the membrane at the bottom of the picture is the very same strings the makes up the membranes at the stop of the picture. The strings in the membrane at the top do not move either. They vibrate. There is a difference. The very same string that is the carrier of the info of the particle at the bottom of the picture. Is also the very same strings That can experts their self in a timely faction. Having mass and related in time. are able to express their self's as point like objects that can be detected with particles detectors. Strings can expresses their self in two different ways. ALL at the same time. All you need to do in your papers is state it like I just did. Then it's all right to say the space is performing as if the are supper fast particles found in nature. and this is the way that nature performs in nature. Nature will prove you right if you start saying " as if " If you say " as if ". It then becomes all right to use the logic of faster than light particles. Because there are ways in the lab to prove what you are saying.

    There is just one more thing that I want to say to you before I go to bed to night. many act like one. One acts like many. If you are using many particles in your experiment. There might be some thing like a interference pattern. But when you use just one particle. In order for the data to come out like it does. For the experiment to perform like it does. The same shape that the geometry of the field energy makes when you use many particles. For the experiment to perform the way that it does. It would have to make the same geometrical shape when you use just one particle. and if you are using just one particle. How does the shape of the interference form. When their is just one particle in use. One particle can't interfere with it's self. Because there is just one particle in use. A particle can't do this. But a string can. Because it can rest in two different places in space at the same time. In many places in space at the same time. It can have more than one histories. The string can have many histories. There is a way to tell what is happening if you could look at the light with out recording it. You would have to find out what is happening when you choose not to look. What I mean what is happening when you detect the particle. And you are looking at the light all at the same time. There is a way to look at the light with out detecting it. You can look at the light and see what is happening when you use just one particle. You could use just one particle and look at the light at the same time. And see if it makes the same geometrical shape with one as it does with many. If you see the same shape with many as you do with just one. It's strings. And not waves nor particles.

    Your right about there being some thing about gravity the is fasted than light. But nothing is moving. Gravity does not come in from all directions. It does not go out in all direction. It does not push or pull. Atoms move under their own power. Self propelled. It is " as if " it is connected in all directions. It is only connected in the directions of other atoms. Kind of like a shadow. Push gravity But it's not the shadow that makes atoms move. But if each object is casting a shadow. Each atom would be resting in the shadow of the other atom shadow. Kind of like a arrow of time pointing in the direction in witch each atom will move. Towards each other. To find where you are making your mistake. You will have to go back and review the history of this shadow stuff "Lord Rayliegh". Type this in to googles and see what you can find. I read about it in " Fundamentals of Photonics ". You need to buy this book. It will help you more than any thing I know. Read Dr. Kock's book also. ( Lasers and Holography. He will take you step by step through the history behind the technology. The scattering of light by the edge of a object. This is what Lord Rayliegh worked on. Along with a lot of other stuff. But later on we found out that the light was being diffracted by the edge of objects. Lord Rayliegh Used a round disk to do his experiments with. And what he found out was that " even in the darkest part of the shadow. There could be found light. A light that didn't shine. How can this be. Only if you look into the direction from where the source of the light is coming from can you see the light. The arrow of time thing. Gravity works great at night. And the atoms don't produce any light. Atoms are made of this kind of light that does not shine. Later on we found out that when ever the light Diffract's around all of the edged of a dish. It forms the geometrical shape of a positive lens Now picture this. If there was two different light sources that came from two different directions. And it made the two atoms cast shadows in the direction of the other atom. Just like in your shadow form of gravity. At the same time each atom would form the geometrical shape of a positive lens that would point in the direction of the other atom. But when ever two positive lenses meet. It forme a free space negative lens. Atoms are round. And there is a tube ( the gravitational field) that forms between the two atoms. It connects the two atoms together. And this is the way that it works with every atom in the universe. The only thing is the same membrane that makes up the sphere shape of the atom. Is all so the same membrane that makes up the tube part of the atom. Positives lenses form a sphere in the middle of them. The sphere shape of the positive lens can form a unbroken chain composed of membranes to negative lenses. They can form a unbroken chain. Just like a train. When ever this train of lenses forms. It is not two different shapes. It is just one shape. Because it is all connected together as one thing. Not two. And this is also the way that gravity works. This is the way that atoms are like in nature. This is the way that gravity works. The way that atoms are in nature is also the way the gravity is in nature. They are inseparable. Two different aspects of the same thing. They are as one. The positive energy of a atom is equal to the negative energy of it's gravitational field. This is why you have to compute gravity as a binary system. In the end you will have to go to nature. Nature will not come to you. Is it the shadow that makes gravity work. Or is it the tube of light that does not shine. That has to do with gravity. There is one way to find out which system is right. Look at the light and see. Is there a shadow in the darkest part of the shadow. No. Is there a tube of light found in the darkest part of the shadow? Yes.

   If the lines are produce by waves. Then what is causing the fringe pattern seen in the plate. If you polarize the light in the room. The fringe pattern goes away. When you polarize the light in the room. the line seen in the film does not go a way. There for the lines and the fringe pattern seen in the plate are two different things. There are several things that could be happening here. It could be the recording of the interference pattern of light. But if the lines are recording of waves. Then what is causing the fringe pattern. It could be particles hitting the film in just the right place and forming the shape of a line. But particles are random. They would not form the pattern of a line. But on the other hand. If there is a very small tube of light. Where every the tube is at. The particles can be detected there. Where every the particles are at. This will be the places where the particles will interact with the chemicals of the film. And the line forms. The interaction of the particles with elements of the film maps out the presents of the string. But if the film has recorded the shape of the line. the when the light is placed on the film. The lines will produce the fringe pattern. Just the same way the strings will produce the fringe pattern in the membranes that I'm taking pictures of. The waves would have to be making two different interference patterns. What would be there to cause the light to diffract to produce the lines? The lines is what causes the light to diffract and produce the fringe pattern. Well that's the problem. Particles are detected. What I'm doing is a observation. Because it is a observation and not a detection. You could repeat many known laboratory experiments. And observation what is happening when you are using the particle detector. All at the same time. The double slit experiment? Wheelers double slit experiment. Wheeler used a around disk that formed a positive lens. The same way that I'm forming a positive lens.

    I know the Bohm was doing experiments with plasma gases. Bohm found out that by pumping high energy into the gas. You could see the field energy. It formed tubes. Bohm also believe that the membranes was composed of yet smaller tubes. The called strings. It just so happens the shape of a tube in mechanically sound and it is also mathematically sound. But when I found out that the field energy of simple light also chooses to express it's self as a tube. Other people find it hard to believe. Could it be that the shape of field energy is universal. All transit energy form's it's field energy in the shape of a tube. Because a wave can not expand 3 dimensional. Start off as a point and grow to the shape of a sphere. And still be mechanically sound. There is no known wave form known to man nor nature that can do this. It can not transmit info accurately. So how does nature do it? It doesn't. It can't. But if the info in the field energy goes by way of a tube. It could. the tube doesn't go out wards in every direction like we thing it does. The tube only goes out from the point in the direction that it needs to. If there is no object to be found there in space. light will not shine in that direction. Light will not shine or work in the direction of the black empty space of a wormhole. The same is true for gravity. The field energy of gravity expresses it's self as a tube. I got pictures. The tube part of the atom is it's gravitation field. I thought I all ready said that. And the same would be true for the gravitational field. Gravity doesn't go out from a atom in every direction. It's " as if " it goes out from the atom in all directions. It only goes out in the direction of other atoms. Not in every direction. Only in the direction that is required for it to be come functional. Mechanically sound. In a theory. It is only required to prove what is there. It is not required to prove the things that are not there. There is no signal. There is now gravity wave. There is no gravity particle. But there is a particle. The electron. And it can be found in the atom. Some other feller proved that. And that's just great. That's just some thing that we don't have to prove. Because it has all ready been prove. If light connects two different objects or atoms. Regardless of where you places the two objects. It all ways connects the two with a tube. Creating a false mental image that the field goes out in all direction like a wave from a rock tossed in to the duck pond. The only way to prove this is if you can see the side view of light. This is why I keep saying that this light is not right by man. But it is right by nature. I have found out that nature is quick to do one think and create an illusion that some thing else is happening. Nature has played man for a fool. Or is it. Man has play man a fool. And now we are just starting to wise up to nature. See. This is what you get for practicing science base on assumptions. In sated of checking it out with nature first. It was what man pictured in his head with out every being able to see what is going on. But now we can't say that any more, because now we can see the side view of light. Any thing that is geometrically correct is also mechanically correct, Which is also mathematical correct and if you can back all this up with physical evidence. There is your proof. Lets do it again. Any thing that is geometrically correct( the shape of a tube ) is also mechanically correct,( The crosshatching of the vibrating strings that the membrane of the tube is made of. What causes the light break up) Which is also mathematical correct ( There is a math to string theory ( as of right now It's all math) )and if you can back all this up with physical evidence. ( Except the physical evidence at it's face value. Trust nature. She will not make you look a fool.) There is your proof.

    Thank you; "An infinite velocity particle is simultaneously everywhere along its trajectory" Spoken by Neil in his own works. You have just gave me you verbal discreption of the true nature of a string. strings are not a signal. They do not " velocity " They are a standing wave. Just like those found in nature. They are here and there at the same time. They are not related in time. They vibrate. The vibration of the string is what causes the broken up light to move. If the broken up light. The particle. moves. It is related in time. If it now is related in time. Then it becomes a signal. Now the moment that we have all been waiting for. The moment of truth, May I have the "Envelop Please". I sorry. What I mean to say was. May I have the " Bottle Please ". If there was a so called infininty velocity particle that light is composed of. It could not be seen with the human eye. Wait a minute. I think I can see some thing. Look. look look. Quick. There goes some now. If light was composed of a infinity velocity particle. You could not see it with your eye. But if light was a standing wave. A string that does not move. Why am I seeing light. Why are we seeing light. Why is every body seeing light. Tell me why. Is it because Neil can't see the light. But every body else can? Think about that one Neil. What's wrong with this picture? "Nothing". That's what's wrong with it. The Nothing part of it. it's not me that you have to convince. It's nature. Nature is not the person that you have to convince that strings are not real. The pictures that I'm am taking par produced by nature. i have brought forth my physical evidence. just like in a court of law. The burden of proof is not on you to prove the strings are not real. I have proven the strings are real It is now your job to prove that strings are not real. This is the way it works among honorable men. If you are unwilling to play by the rules that honorable men play by. Now is the time to say so. You must take the same evidence. Produced in the same way that I produced. And prove that there is nothing there in the picture. It's a picture, Neil. Pictures don't lie. Larry

    There may be some thing that I'm doing that might interest you. Bohm did a lot of work in plasma physics. He talked about the tubes of energy in plasma. He also felt that the tubes were composed of yet smaller string like things. Bohm talked about them to Einstein. The light that I'm studying. It don't do right. It doesn't act like light should. It is acting more like a high energy plasma gas than light. Did Bohm find strings 50 years ago? Are strings only found in plasma gases? Is string theory, light, and plasma gases all the same stuff? Light may be some weird kind of plasma. We just didn't know it till right now. larry

    There may be some thing that I'm doing that might interest you. Bohm did a lot of work in plasma physics. He talked about the tubes of energy in plasma. He also felt that the tubes were composed of yet smaller string like things. Bohm talked about them to Einstein. The light that I'm studying. It don't do right. It doesn't act like light should. It is acting more like a high energy plasma gas than light. Did Bohm find strings 50 years ago? Are strings only found in plasma gases? Is string theory, light, and plasma gases all the same stuff? Light may be some weird kind of plasma. We just didn't know it till right now. The Bohm thing? Sure. If you cut a hologram up in to little pieces. Every one of those pieces of the hologram has the same ability to produce the image of the objects the is recorded in it. each pieces has the same info as does all the other pieces. But if strings are what make holograms work. Strings can rest in two different places in space at the same time. The same string can rest in many different places at the same time. The recorded film of holograms are made up of the same string resting space here and there. This means that if you cut up the hologram. Every pieces of the hologram would have the same info as does every other pieces of the hologram. Particles can't do this. All particles are related in time. They can not be in two different places at the same time. So How does nature do this? She uses strings. If you use the logic of the true nature of string. It simplifies the though process. You don't have to run out into the back yard late at night and beat your head against a flat rock to come up with some hair brained ideal to make particles do what we know good and well that particles can not do. You can use the string. Or you can learn to stop screaming because your head is hurting and take the pain. Larry

    What do you think I'm working on. I'm trying to find ways to prove that strings are real. Did you know the we now know that what makes a hologram work is not waves. They have taken the film of a hologram and cut it. And looked at it under a microscope. The opaque part of the film is not a bunches of waves. The opaque part of the file is composed of little fragmented squiggly lines. That right I said lines. I know that Dr. Kock was making costic sheets of light form. Membranes. and making holograms of the membranes of negative lenses. Dr. Kock has pictures of them in his book. This means that if I have found a way to make strings form that are long and are not fragmented. There is a way to record them in the film of holograms. And reproduce them as a hologram. But in the world of holograms. There is a kind of hologram that they call a transit hologram. This is where you make a hologram of the strings the rest in the space before you. Then you take that hologram that has the strings that are resting in the space before you. And use it to produce a hologram of the strings. But if while the hologram is up and running. If you take another plate. The film used to make holograms with. And you place it in the space where the strings rest before you. And record the presents of the strings found there. If you take that hologram and cut it open. You will find that it has recorded in it. A long unbroken string in beaded or recorded in it. But if strings are real. They would have mass. This means that if you do the eyeball experiment. Where the mass of the strings make the light diffract around the string and produce a fringe pattern in a membranes. And if you use the transit hologram setup. And prove that ever thing that I'm saying about how string are able to break up the light in the membranes and form the fringe pattern But if it is polarizes light produced by the strings. That causes the light to break up. You could also use polarized screens in your experiment and prove that it the polarizing effect of strings that is causing the light to break up. By recording the effect in the film of holograms. you could develop the physical proof the strings are real. Because you could prove that strings have mass. Strings would have to have mass in order to interact with light and cause the light to diffract. Just the same way the every other thing that is composed of mass. Matter. Has mass. Every thing in the universe is composed of matter. All matter has mass. If this is found to be true. Then strings are real. And one more thing. If you are watching the side view of a steady stream of particles moving down a string. If you use polarized screens in your experiment to turn off the ability for the string to break up. And form particles that can be detected. It is the strings that is causing the light to break up and form packets. Your particle. There are ways to test for string. Say. Haven't we all ready used polarizes screens in our experiments to turn of light before. I think we have. But we don't know what is happening in the light that turns off the ability of light to form packets. So that you can detect Particles. with a particle detector. I was using polarized screens a few years back. In my experiments. The polarized screens didn't stop the light form coming through the screens. But it did cause the fringe pattern found in the membranes to go a way. It made me wonder why that is. Now I know. Larry

   That's the piece of dirt that you plow and plant corn in. Why do you ask? When they first studied magnets. They places piece of paper over the magnet. and sprinkled iron filling on the paper. It produced a pattern that looked like rows in a plowed field. That you plant corn in. When they study the lines of the rows. They found out that the lines seamed to go out for ever. That's why they call it the magnet field. But when they started to study light. Newton found out that the light could also formed rows in it. The Newton rings. Now days they call the rows found in light a fringe pattern At first they thought that the fringe pattern was being produced by the constructed and destructive interference patters produced by waves. They developed the math of waves and was able to produce the same effect of the concealing out of the energy of waves. So they was lead to believe the light was a wave. From time to time we have to remind them. Less they for get. At this late date and time. A sad state of affairs. Light is not light like throwing a rock in to a pond of water. And forming waves. waves in light can do what waves in water can not do. light can't be expressing it's self like a wave in water. If not that kind of wave. Then what kind of wave is light? It's not a wave at all. there was a person that sent me a link where there was a Dr. that was using a computer generated program that he designed. That used the polarizing effect of diffracted light produced by strings that crossed paths with each other and was getting a fringe pattern just like that found in light. I had seen in the eye ball experiment. Where there was a membranes where there was strings coming out from the membrane. The strings when out a way from the membranes did not cross each others paths. The individual strings did not form a membranes nor did they form a fringe pattern. But the place that they all curved around and came back together. It formed a membranes with a fringe pattern in it. For about five years now .I have been asking my self. How does I do that. Then about two months ago It donged on me. The light that diffract's around a sphere of light and forms a focal point. But the light goes on past the focal point and forms a membrane. See the drawing of Wheelers delayed reaction experiment. But if the object that was difracting the light was a lone line Like a hair. (the whisker experiment that I told every body about.) Instead of a sphere. It would also form a membrane. But if there was more that one hair. A lot of hairs. It would form a much bigger membrane. But if the hairs were crossing each others path. It would cause a polarizing effect. It would cause blind spots in the membrane. If the strings where places just so, so. the blind spots where the polarizing effect is effecting the membrane would form blind spot's in a row. Just like the rows that you find in a field that you plant corn in. But if the strings is what makes the light break up into rows ( the fringe pattern found in the membranes of light.) Then could it not also be true. That a very small tube of light that is composed of a membrane. In which the membrane has a sub structure to it. That is composed of yet smaller strings. That would make the membrane break up into rows. But the rows would be like little rings around the tube. And if it so happened that the strings started to vibrate. It would cause the little rings to move down the tube. Even though the strings are not moving down the tube. They are standing still and only vibrating. The broken up light would move down the tube. If the strings were vibrating at the speed of light. The broken up light. The little bands of light the little rings. The little units the little packets of energy the little unites of mass. Would move down the tube at the speed of light. And if the strings crossed paths in just such a way. The packets of energy and mass would have the same energy and mass as does particles. Like the ones we find in nature. I give you your particles. On the end of a string. They can also use string theory to predict the interaction of particles. Murray Gillmann. These chain of interaction of particle make up every known thing in our universe. That why they call them the building blocks of the universe. The y- strings. But the atom is no different from any thing else we find in the universe. They to have a chain if interaction found with in them. The interaction takes place some where on the back side of the atom. If the same chain of interactions that is happening on the back side of the atom is found to be the same chain of interaction that take place in the half spheres found in positive lenses. We will have our gravity. To get atoms to perform like they do in nature. You will have to get the particle to perform the way that it does in nature. But in order to get particles to perform the way that they do in nature. You will have to get strings to perform the way that they do in nature. Ever thing in our universe is composed of the a chain of interactions of particles. The building blocks of nature. The chain of interaction of particles can be tracked back to the way the string perform in nature. There can be nothing in our universe that is real with out strings. Larry

    String field theory is not some thing that I came up with. Some other fellow did that In fact I thing there are quite a few people that are working on string theory. The only problem with the theory. They don't have any physical proof. Big problem. String theory has been around for about 30 years now. It has a history. thanks to Warm's link I now have this link. Thanks Warm. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory http://www.superstringtheory.com/ i got that link off this link http://members.tripod.com/da_theoretical1/wdphysics.html I would be hard for me to believe that you have never herd of string theory. Never heard of Dr. kaku? or Dr. Ed Witten. http://www.mkaku.org/ Did you know that Dr Kaku and Jack were two of the people that did the peer review work on NASA"s BPP. Books? Sure. There are a few around. Back to the physical evidence of strings. There has be so many people say the string field theory will fail due to the fact that there is no evidence that nature expresses it's self as a string. That is not a true statement. The only way that nature expresses it's self is as a string. Every thing that is real in our universe, can be tracked back to strings. How much evidence is there that proves that strings are real? "All of it". And I stand by these words You can't have the wave effect with out strings You can't have particles the way that they are in nature with out strings. You can't have membranes with out strings. You can't have objects like atoms that have gravitational fields with out membranes. You can't have some thing like the two atom model with out strings. 10% of the mass of the universe is composed of atoms and their gravitational fields. the gravitational fields and transit energy makes up the other 90% of the mass of the universe. And after that. There is nothing left. If you can't find what you are looking for in the hole of the universe. It's not real. If you can't find what you are looking for In the two atom model of the universe. It's not real. The two atom model of the universe is also the two atom model of gravity. You can take the two atom model of gravity. The building blocks of gravity. The building blacks of a universe. And build a universe. Just like the one that you are standing in. And if you can't find what you are looking for in this, Not some other universe. But this one. the one that you are standing in. It's not real. And you don't know about strings? how could you have missed this one. There is talk about string theory every where. It all over the net. Even truck drivers know about string theory. Where have you been for the past 30 years? Because their are so many people like you that say that string theory will never become a science Or go no to being a technology. It would be imposable for any one to stand up at this late date and time. And say that they have produced the physical evidence of strings. There for. There has to be a layperson that stands up and states that he has produced the physical evidence of strings. What this does is. it paves the way for others to follow. It makes it safe for others to stand up and produce the same evidence and more that develops the physical evidences the strings are just as real as any thing else we find in the universe. with out strings. There would be no universe. Who is going to be the one person that does this? Your talking to him. Why. Because I know how things work like this. I'm working on it right now. Go over to Dr. Kaku's forum. And read my post there. then go over to my web page and read about my experiment that will open the door to finding and developing the physical evidence to prove that strings are real. If strings are real. And can be found any where with in this universe. I will find them. And if I can find them. Any body else can also find them. Will you say when there is a army of scientist that also state that strings are real And have the math and the physical evidence to prove it. When ever body on the face of the planet is saying that strings are real. Will you be the last person to leave the room of disbeliever's and turn off the lights. Neil help me make it happen. Make some history. Be a part of history. I know you are good. You could be the man up on point. Trust in nature. She will not make you look a fool. Use spores from powder puff and do the bottle and spores experiment. You can use your PC Camera and take pictures of the long tubes of light that can be seen there. Go post them on Dr. Kaku's forum. State how you are. And there will be people calling and knocking on your door. With a job your you. Government grants. Money. Lots of money. The people that are looking for the physical evidence of strings. Can get money for any one that can produce one. A job that will last you the rest of your life. You will go down in the history books. And if you go read about what gravity is. and if you can understand what it is that I'm talking about. what gravity is. You may be the person that goes down in the history books that solves the mystery of gravity. Any one here that read this can do the same. Larry

   Home work? Sure. There is a simple experiment that I do in my truck. I use a penny. ( el cheap-o)And after I use the penny in the experiment. usually at some time after I do the experiment. I wind up spending the penny. ( double El cheap-00) In the winter time there usually is salt spray on my windows. If I park at night to where there is a yard light near by. I take a penny out of my pocket. Roll down the side window a little so that I can get my hand and arm out side the window. I place the penny to where it is in between the light and one of my eyes. Because the windows have salt;t spray on them. ( fogged screen effect.) You can see where the shadow from the penny is hitting the window. Your eye is in the darkest part of the shadows. If you move the penny to a point where you can just start to see the light diffract around the penny. if you look at the shadow on the window. you will find that you are still in the darkest part of the shadow on the window. But if you move the penny back to where the penny is half way between the edge of the penny and the center of the penny. Because some of the info of the light is being reflected off of the salt dust around the penny. Giving you reference beam of light Now you have a objective beam and a reference beam. What is needed to form a hologram. If you focus your eye on the distant light. You can see the light. Even though the penny rest firmly between you and the light. Even thought you eye is still in the darkest part of the shadow on the window. How can this be? Have you suddenly developed the ability to see through pennies and brick walls? No. Not really. Have you just acquired the ability to make penny's disappear? No. not really. Then what's going on here. did the info in the light go through the penny? NO. Not really. if one could find a way to see the side view of light as it diffract's around the edge of a object the is round in shape. You get to see what is happening in the dynamic of the system in your experiment. Do you get to see the shadow? No Shadows are a by product of ray optics. Beams of light. Their not real in nature. Rays or shadow don't show up in the side view of light as it diffract's around objects. the shadow can turn off the info of light. But it does it for some other reason than blocking out the light. Then the only thing that you are left to work with is the path that the info in the light travails by form point A to point B. Which can be seen using the side view. It has to go around the penny. The shape that the light makes as it moves through the darkest part of the shadow has been tracked or mapped out with particle detectors. We as men do not know why light can bend around the edge of a object. But we can say the it does bend. or curve. What do you mean? You can see around corners? Gravity can still work around corners? There no such thing as frame dragging in nature. There is now. and now there is a way that you can go see it for your self for pennies on the dollar. We don't need no stinking billion dollar grant to prove that frame dragging is real. El cheap-o rides again. So George is right. we will need the data collected from the frame dragging experiment To build better models of how wormhole effect objects and to what extent will the strength of the force be. In advance. Before we do any experiments with wormholes. Have the data of wormholes before man has the ability to form a wormhole. Or is it have a way to verified what is happening in the dynamic of the system of wormholes. When we all ready have wormhole? Larry But if you theory of either is right. I It would have to explain a way why objects that have different shapes or mass. Weigh in at different weights. Produce different amounts of centrifugal force. But fall at the same rate. and both objects that are falling even though they have different shapes and mass. When they are relating back to the mass of the earth. The forces add up to zero. No other theory known to man can do this. But the two atom model of gravity can. larry

   If this is true. Then tell me how does a object get pushed out of the moth of as wormhole. If there is no particles coming from the direction of the black space to push it. At some point or time or place . the push theory fails. You have to go back to ground zero. And start over again with some other ideal. Hint. Try the two atom model of gravity. It works for me. May be it will work for you to. Larry Thanks for the links. I buzzed over it right quick. I picked up on the word Feynman. Feynman blew a hole in this theory about 30 years ago. The stated that if a object was moving through space. It would be hitting more particles on one side than it does the other. This would cause objects to slow down and stop at one point or other. Objects once set in to motion. In free space don't slow down with time. This is the main reason I past it by. Nature proves Feynman right. It talks about the horns of the bull. A yoke. The word yoke is also a technical term. They are used in many different ways. Because the path that the sun takes relative us. Here on the ground. It takes the path of the shape of a oval. because the path that the sun takes is compound and complex. You would need machinery that also is compound and complex. they were able to do this by using yokes. Just like a universal joint in your car's drive shaft. ( I had to fix my car one time. one? OK so I lied. It was a lot of times.) But knowing about yokes in advance. Helped me to solve the mystery of the ark. When I ran across them in the bible. I knew what had to be done in order to track the sun. And I also knew what a yoke could do for you. Sure enough. This is what they did. And how they did it. The ark formed a wormhole. Form a wormhole. And then you can manipulate gravity. This is the way it works. Larry

    Warm: Trouble in paradise? Boy you can say that again. Help me out here. There is some thing big going down right now. We can be eye witnesses to a history making event. At last. At long lest. The people that are doing this. Are coming out of the shadows and their hiding places. And standing in the sun light for all to see. Remember how I told you that they had cut the funding for this kind of technology. These people are out of work. They are looking for a job. But due to the no bid contracts. They are cutting the money to the companies that work on this craft. The people that developed this technology. And boy are they hot. These people are also, out of work. And gave the money and contracts to some people that don't know what it is that they are doing. What has been going on is a power grab. There are people that are using the government to yank the technology from out of the hands of the people that developed it. And give it to others That are not qualifies to do the work. They are now making big mistakes. The people that they laid off. The government doesn't have any control over them any more. The laid off people are fighting for their jobs back again. They know about the effects that a wormhole will have on objects. They know what caused the cement and steel to turn into dust. They also know how much energy it would take to turn that much concert and steel into dust. They have turned whistle blowers. They are talking to the people over at 9/11. They had a big meeting of the minds last weekend in Madison , Wi. DR. Judy Woods has a new web page. They fixed it so that nobody could go to her old web page so she had to get a new one. One out side the U.S. Like me. http://drjudywood.co.uk/ My other web page http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Lab/9958/ But if you go to Judy's page. Then go here. http://drjudywood.co.uk/articles/DEW/StarWarsBeam7.html Down at the bottom of the page. There is a lot of new stuff and links. If you listen to what they say. The "words" That they are using. Shop talk. Then go here. http://www.fas.org/main/search.jsp And type in the key words in to the pages search engine. And see what comes up. If you go here. http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio/index.php?dir=911/&sort=date&order=asc Click on list by date. The first 7 audio's that come up on top is about the meeting in Madison. There talking about the LEO things. You can find what was said in Madison. At the big meeting. The big powwooooow. Oh may God. Well. It looks like we are all going to die. Stop screaming and take the pain. The good part about dieing is. Before we die we are going to find out what makes those UFO thing fly. The force field that they talk about. The orbs. I found out how they make them. I found it in Dr. Kock's book. The drawing is on the wall behind Dr, Kock. It is coded. You have to unlock the code. I have a drawing of that the picture is like on my other web page. Because I posted my drawing in the net. I think this is why they kicked me off the net. They want let me get back on my web page. They changed the pass word. If you use one concave mirror over the top of the other. You can make a very weird hologram form. Membranes in the form of a sphere. The membrane is like a man made universe. A sphere. The craft rest on the inside of the sphere. They can take another hologram of a wormhole. Over lap the two holograms. And a wormhole will form in the sphere relative to the craft on the inside of the sphere. By being able to move the wormholes around to here they want them to be. They can make the craft go where they want it to go. So now we know "why the sphere". And we also know how they are able to make it form. And how they are able to get the membranes of the sphere to form wormholes in it. Larry

   This may be true. But what is there would not be the type of wormhole that you are thinking about. A gravitational free space negative lens. This is what a wormhole is. It is not like the ones we take pictures of in outer space. They are not composed of that much mass. They have very little mass. In a shallow stream. as the water is flowing. If you look at the bottom of the stream. Some place down stream from where the water goes by a rock. The rock will cause turbulence in the water. The turbulence is random. The turbulence then starts to interact with it's self. The water will start to spin then form a whirlpool. The sun light will form a positive lens at first. But as the strength of the whirlpool grows. The positive lens turns into a open ended positive. lens. It does the same thing as a wormhole. The focal point will invert and forma tube on the inside of the positive lens. this is the same thing that a wormhole does. On the inside of the lens is a space that is black. light will not shine through it. There is a black dot that forms on the bottom of the stream. Some people believe that the forming of the open ended negative lens is what cause the water to spin. Some people believe the forming of the whirlpool is what caused the lens action. May be they both happen at the same time. Hurricanes do the same thing. And wormhole like those that form in outer space do the same thing. When light passes through a hole in a piece of paper. It forms a negative lens. You can look through the hole and see the light of other days so to speak. If you make a hologram of the lens of light that goes through a hole. By using a resonator. At a distance you can see light coming through the hole. But because the hologram freezes the lens where it is at. If you move in closed to the hole. The hole in the paper turns black and you can't see the light on the other side. We have been able to do the same thing with gravitational negative lens in outer space. Using the same space lens. We can use it to take pictures of what is on through other side. But we can get pictures of the black empty space that is there also. Wormhole are very much like negative lenses.

   That's what why I keep saying all the weird thing that I do. If you can see the things that are there. Other than the box. See things on the inside of the box. And things on the out side of the box. It changes the way you think about what is real. If the pictures that I'm taking is of nature expressing it's self as a tube of light. (space) What in the world could any body say about tubes or strings that would make all the pieces fit together. Can a string do it all? There has to be a way. If nature can do it. Then there has to be a way in order for it to happen. Nature is all ways right. Some times man can be wrong. The best thing that i can think of is. "Why don't we look to nature to tell us how she does it." Strings don't complicate things. It simplifies the process. Having nature tell you the answer is a no brainer. larry Neil: There is some thing that is wrong with what you are saying. Atoms don't run down. They don't gain energy or loose energy. Sounds a lot like gravity doesn't it. There are atoms that have been around for 13.5 billions years. Why didn't they run down? Now I can't say that they can never run down. But as long as the electron. Is expressing it self in a timely manner and showing singes of motion. There will be gravity. And I can't say the will never run down because we haven't reached the end of time yet. The end of days. The end of every thing. But long after man as gone. Atoms will still be going. Just like perpetual motion. With out end. This is not a violation of the conservative laws of nature. a energy is accounted for. With out loss or gain of energy means just that. Some day you will get to test your theory of ether. If the particles of your ether will no go through the black empty space of a wormhole. If there can be no wind to push the object out of the mouth of the wormhole. Then what? Talk about pushing. Remember the story about the seven blind man that were asked to take a tooth pick and walk out and poke a prickly pear? And the didn't want to play any more because every time they went to poke the prickly pare. It poked them back first But if you Blinded folded some one. Gave them a tooth pick. And told them to poke the tooth pick down the mouth of a wormhole. And the instant that they pushed the tooth pick in to the mouth of the wormhole. Some thing started to push back When they took off the blind fold. They would be surprised to find that there wasn't any thing there to push back. How can this be? That's it. If the only thing there is the toothpick. The tooth pick would have to be what is pushing back. The atoms that the tooth pick is made of. Is what's producing the force. But as lone as the tooth pick is in the mouth of the wormhole. It will produce a force that doesn't run down. Kind of like that perpetual motion stuff. You know what I mean. That gravity stuff. But if you look at the toothpick is see what is it about a toothpick that is like perpetual motion. And the only thing you can find that is like perpetual motions the electron found in the atoms that the toothpick is made of. That's it. That's your answer. Who would have ever thought that gravity is like a toothpick? No wonder man hasn't been able to solve the mystery of gravity. Where do you all ways find things that you are looking for? The last place you look. What were you saying about the ether Neil? Larry Warm: Waite a minute. This is some thing I know a lot about. Rays???? What rays would that be???? There are no stinking rays found in nature. That's not the way that it works. If the lens is made out of glass. It refracts. There is no glass lens found in a pin hole camera. There is only a very small hole. The light is diffracted by the edge of the hole. And it preferences as if there is a negative lens there. But their not. The focal point in the negative lens should be forming in the center of the hole. But now. We find out that there is no such thing as a focal point in the center of a negative lens. If there is no focal point to be found there. How can here possibly be any thing like a rays optics found in nature. There is nothing found in the center of the hole. It all empty space. Warm. Take that book your readying and through it in the trash. The trot down town and buy you a new copy of "Fundamentals of Photonics" by Saleh, Bahaa E.A.; Teich, Malvin Carl Don't feel bad. I made the same mistake. Held my progress on my work backs by 20 years. I too was using a